VS
At a Glance
Power
186hp @ 6000
141hp @ 6000
Torque
186lb-ft @ 4000
140lb-ft @ 4000
Fuel
28 mpg est.
30 mpg est.
Engine
2.5 L/152ci
2.0 L/122ci
Choosing between the Mazda CX-30 and the Nissan Kicks is one of the most common decisions car buyers in the United States face. The Mazda CX-30 delivers 186hp @ 6000 while the Nissan Kicks produces 141hp @ 6000. On fuel, the CX-30 returns 28 mpg est. while the Kicks uses 30 mpg est. — important in a market where fuel prices change monthly. Pricing starts at $26,375 for the CX-30 and $24,230 for the Kicks. Both vehicles have their merits. The right choice depends on your priorities: fuel economy, performance, towing ability, safety features or total cost of ownership. This comparison covers every specification available so you can make an informed decision.
Performance
Power Output (hp)
186hp @ 6000
141hp @ 6000
Torque (lb-ft)
186lb-ft @ 4000
140lb-ft @ 4000
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Capacity
2.5 L/152ci
2.0 L/122ci
Cylinders
4
4
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Gasoline
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Number of Gears
6
—
Drive Wheels
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Fuel Economy
Fuel Economy (Combined, est.)
28 mpg est.
30 mpg est.
Fuel Economy - City (mpg)
24 (Est)mpg
27mpg
Fuel Economy - Highway (mpg)
31 (Est)mpg
34mpg
Fuel Tank Capacity (gal)
12.7gal
11.8gal
Dimensions
Length (in)
173in
171.9in
Width (in)
70.7in
70.9in
Height (in)
61.4in
64in
Wheelbase (in)
104.4in
104.9in
Curb Weight (lbs)
3395lbs
3233lbs
Safety
ABS
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Brake Assist
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Stability Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Traction Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Driver Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Passenger Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Side Airbags Front
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Curtain Airbags
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Features & Tech
Air Conditioning
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Cruise Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Adaptive Cruise Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Bluetooth
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Backup Camera
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Rear Parking Aid
—
✓ Standard
Keyless Entry
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Alloy Wheels
✓ Standard
—
The Verdict
Which Wins?
Overall Winner
Nissan Kicks
2 / 4 categories
Performance
CX-30
Fuel Economy
Kicks
Value
Kicks
Practicality
Tied
Pros & Cons
Mazda CX-30
Well-rounded specification
Higher fuel consumption (28 mpg est.)
Higher starting price
Nissan Kicks
Better fuel economy (30 mpg est.)
Lower starting price ($24,230)
Few notable weaknesses
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more fuel efficient, the CX-30 or Kicks?
The CX-30 gets 28 mpg est. and the Kicks gets 30 mpg est. on the combined cycle. The Kicks is the more fuel-efficient choice. In real-world conditions with a mix of highway and urban driving, actual figures will be slightly higher.
Which has more power, the CX-30 or Kicks?
The CX-30 produces 186hp @ 6000 and 186lb-ft @ 4000 of torque while the Kicks delivers 141hp @ 6000 and 140lb-ft @ 4000 of torque. The CX-30 is the more powerful option.
What is the price difference between the CX-30 and Kicks?
The CX-30 starts from $26,375 and the Kicks from $24,230. The Kicks is cheaper by $2,145 at this variant level. Final on-the-road pricing varies by dealer and specification.
Should I buy the CX-30 or the Kicks?
It depends on your priorities. If fuel economy matters most, check the mpg figures above. If you need towing capacity, compare the towing ratings. For day-to-day driving - commutes, school runs and highway trips - consider ground clearance, service network coverage, and total cost of ownership including insurance and maintenance. Use the spec tables above to compare every detail before making your decision.