VS
At a Glance
Power
88kW@6000
59 kW
Torque
160Nm@4250
104 Nm
Fuel
6.6
5.4 l/100km
Towing
1150
—
0-100 km/h
10.9
—
Engine
1598
1197 cc
Choosing between the CITROEN C3 and the Suzuki Eeco is one of the most common decisions South African car buyers face. The CITROEN C3 delivers 88kW@6000 while the Suzuki Eeco produces 59 kW. On fuel, the C3 returns 6.6 while the Eeco uses 5.4 l/100km — important in a market where fuel prices change monthly. Pricing starts at R240 900 for the C3 and R231 900 for the Eeco. Both vehicles have their merits. The right choice depends on your priorities: fuel economy, performance, towing ability, safety features or total cost of ownership. This comparison covers every specification available so you can make an informed decision.
Performance
Power Output
88kW@6000
59 kW
Torque
160Nm@4250
104 Nm
0-100 kph
10.9
—
Top Speed
190
—
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Capacity
1598
1197 cc
Engine Layout
TRANSVERSE INLINE 4
inline
Cylinders
4
4
Fuel Type
UNLEADED
petrol
Transmission
AUTOMATIC
manual
Number of Gears
4
5
Drive Wheels
FRONT
rear
Full Time 4x4
✗
—
Low Range
✗
—
Fuel Economy
Fuel Consumption Average
6.6
5.4 l/100km
Fuel Consumption Urban
9.4
—
Fuel Consumption Highway
5
—
Fuel Tank Capacity
50
32 l
CO2 Emissions
153
—
Dimensions
Length
3941
3675 mm
Width
1728-1994
1475 mm
Height
1524
1825 mm
Wheelbase
2466
2350 mm
Ground Clearance
—
160 mm
Kerb Weight
1089
935 Kg
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
2
Towing & Payload
Towing Capacity
1150
—
Load Capacity
300
615 l
Safety
ABS
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
EBD
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Stability Control
✗
✓ Standard
Traction Control
✗
—
Airbag Count
6
2
Driver Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Passenger Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Side Airbags Front
✓ Standard
—
Curtain Airbags
✓ Standard
—
Features & Tech
Air Conditioning
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Climate Control
✗
—
Cruise Control
✓ Standard
—
Adaptive Cruise Control
✗
—
Bluetooth
✓ Standard
—
Satellite Navigation
✗
—
Park Distance Rear
✗
✓ Standard
Park Distance Front
✗
—
Sunroof
✗
—
Heated Seats
✗
—
Electric Seat Adjustment
✗
—
Keyless Entry
✗
—
Alloy Wheels
✓ Standard
—
Warranty & Service
Warranty Period
36
3
Warranty Distance
100000
100000 Km
Service Plan
S
—
Service Intervals
40000
15000
The Verdict
Which Wins?
Overall Winner
Suzuki Eeco
3 / 4 categories
Performance
Eeco
Fuel Economy
Eeco
Value
Eeco
Practicality
C3
Pros & Cons
CITROEN C3
Well-rounded specification
Higher fuel consumption (6.6)
Higher starting price
Suzuki Eeco
Better fuel economy (5.4 l/100km)
Lower starting price (R231 900)
Few notable weaknesses
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more fuel efficient, the C3 or Eeco?
The C3 uses 6.6 and the Eeco uses 5.4 l/100km on the combined cycle. The Eeco is the more fuel-efficient choice. In South African conditions with a mix of highway and urban driving, real-world figures will be slightly higher.
Which has more power, the C3 or Eeco?
The C3 produces 88kW@6000 and 160Nm@4250 of torque while the Eeco delivers 59 kW and 104 Nm of torque. They produce similar power outputs.
What is the price difference between the C3 and Eeco?
The C3 starts from R240 900 and the Eeco from R231 900. The Eeco is cheaper by R9 000 at this variant level. Final on-the-road pricing varies by dealer and specification.
Which has a higher towing capacity, the C3 or Eeco?
The C3 has a braked towing capacity of 1150 and the Eeco can tow not specified. Always verify towing limits in the owner's manual before hitching a trailer.
Should I buy the C3 or the Eeco?
It depends on your priorities. If fuel economy matters most, check the L/100km figures above. If you need towing capacity, compare the towing ratings. For day-to-day South African driving - load shedding runs, potholed roads, school runs and highway commutes - consider ground clearance, service network coverage, and total cost of ownership including insurance and maintenance. Use the spec tables above to compare every detail before making your decision.