VS
At a Glance
Power
77 kW
60 kW
Torque
138 Nm
112 Nm
Fuel
5.5 l/100km
4.6 l/100km
Towing
1000 Kg
—
Engine
1462 cc
1197 cc
Choosing between the Suzuki Fronx and the Suzuki Swift is one of the most common decisions car buyers in South Africa face. The Suzuki Fronx delivers 77 kW while the Suzuki Swift produces 60 kW. On fuel, the Fronx returns 5.5 l/100km while the Swift uses 4.6 l/100km — important in a market where fuel prices change monthly. Pricing starts at R303 900 for the Fronx and R296 900 for the Swift. Both vehicles have their merits. The right choice depends on your priorities: fuel economy, performance, towing ability, safety features or total cost of ownership. This comparison covers every specification available so you can make an informed decision.
Performance
Power Output
77 kW
60 kW
Torque
138 Nm
112 Nm
Top Speed
175 Km/h
165 Km/h
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Capacity
1462 cc
1197 cc
Engine Layout
inline
inline
Cylinders
4
3
Fuel Type
petrol
petrol
Transmission
manual
automatic
Number of Gears
5
-
Drive Wheels
front
front
Fuel Economy
Fuel Consumption Average
5.5 l/100km
4.6 l/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity
37 l
37 l
CO2 Emissions
129 g/km
107 g/km
Dimensions
Length
3995 mm
3860 mm
Width
1765 mm
1735 mm
Height
1550 mm
1520 mm
Wheelbase
2520 mm
2450 mm
Ground Clearance
170 mm
145 mm
Kerb Weight
1005 Kg
945 Kg
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Load Volume
304-605-1009 l
265-580-948 l
Towing & Payload
Towing Capacity
1000 Kg
—
Safety
ABS
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
EBD
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Brake Assist
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Stability Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Airbag Count
6
6
Driver Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Passenger Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Side Airbags Front
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Curtain Airbags
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Features & Tech
Air Conditioning
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Climate Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Cruise Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Bluetooth
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Reversing Camera
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Park Distance Rear
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Keyless Entry
—
✓ Standard
Alloy Wheels
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Warranty & Service
Warranty Period
5
5
Warranty Distance
200000 Km
200000 Km
Service Plan
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Service Plan Years
4yr
4yr
Service Plan Distance
60000km
60000km
Service Intervals
15000
15000
The Verdict
Which Wins?
Overall Winner
Tie
2 / 4 categories
Performance
Fronx
Fuel Economy
Swift
Value
Swift
Practicality
Fronx
Pros & Cons
Suzuki Fronx
More powerful engine (77 kW)
Higher fuel consumption (5.5 l/100km)
Higher starting price
Suzuki Swift
Better fuel economy (4.6 l/100km)
Lower starting price (R296 900)
Less power than rival (60 kW vs 77 kW)
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more fuel efficient, the Fronx or Swift?
The Fronx uses 5.5 l/100km and the Swift uses 4.6 l/100km on the combined cycle. The Swift is the more fuel-efficient choice. In real-world conditions with a mix of highway and urban driving, actual figures will be slightly higher.
Which has more power, the Fronx or Swift?
The Fronx produces 77 kW and 138 Nm of torque while the Swift delivers 60 kW and 112 Nm of torque. The Fronx is the more powerful option.
What is the price difference between the Fronx and Swift?
The Fronx starts from R303 900 and the Swift from R296 900. The Swift is cheaper by R7 000 at this variant level. Final on-the-road pricing varies by dealer and specification.
Which has a higher towing capacity, the Fronx or Swift?
The Fronx has a braked towing capacity of 1000 Kg and the Swift can tow not specified. Always verify towing limits in the owner's manual before hitching a trailer.
Should I buy the Fronx or the Swift?
It depends on your priorities. If fuel economy matters most, check the L/100km figures above. If you need towing capacity, compare the towing ratings. For day-to-day South African driving - load shedding runs, potholed roads, school runs and highway commutes - consider ground clearance, service network coverage, and total cost of ownership including insurance and maintenance. Use the spec tables above to compare every detail before making your decision.