VS
At a Glance
Power
121 kW
110 kW
Torque
213 Nm
226 Nm
Fuel
6.6 l/100km
6.5 l/100km
Towing
1200 Kg
—
Engine
1998 cc
1477 cc
Choosing between the Mazda CX-30 and the Proton X50 is one of the most common decisions South African car buyers face. The Mazda CX-30 delivers 121 kW while the Proton X50 produces 110 kW. On fuel, the CX-30 returns 6.6 l/100km while the X50 uses 6.5 l/100km — important in a market where fuel prices change monthly. Pricing starts at R539 800 for the CX-30 and R535 900 for the X50. Both vehicles have their merits. The right choice depends on your priorities: fuel economy, performance, towing ability, safety features or total cost of ownership. This comparison covers every specification available so you can make an informed decision.
Performance
Power Output
121 kW
110 kW
Torque
213 Nm
226 Nm
Top Speed
196 Km/h
—
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Capacity
1998 cc
1477 cc
Engine Layout
inline
inline
Cylinders
4
3
Fuel Type
petrol
petrol
Forced Induction Device
—
turbocharger
Transmission
automatic
automatic
Number of Gears
6
7
Drive Wheels
front
front
Fuel Economy
Fuel Consumption Average
6.6 l/100km
6.5 l/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity
51 l
45 l
CO2 Emissions
150 g/km
150 g/km
Dimensions
Length
4395 mm
4330 mm
Width
1795-2040 mm
1800 mm
Height
1540 mm
1609 mm
Wheelbase
2655 mm
2600 mm
Ground Clearance
175 mm
—
Kerb Weight
1340 Kg
1350 Kg
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Load Volume
295-1200 l
—
Towing & Payload
Towing Capacity
1200 Kg
—
Safety
ABS
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
EBD
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Brake Assist
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Stability Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Traction Control
—
✓ Standard
Airbag Count
7
6
Driver Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Passenger Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Side Airbags Front
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Curtain Airbags
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Features & Tech
Air Conditioning
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Climate Control
—
✓ Standard
Cruise Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Bluetooth
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Reversing Camera
—
✓ Standard
Park Distance Rear
—
✓ Standard
Park Distance Front
—
✓ Standard
Keyless Entry
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Alloy Wheels
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Warranty & Service
Warranty Period
5
5
Warranty Distance
unlimited Km
unlimited Km
Service Plan
✓ Standard
Optional
Service Plan Years
5
—
Service Plan Distance
unlimited
—
Service Intervals
15000
15000
The Verdict
Which Wins?
Overall Winner
Tie
2 / 4 categories
Performance
CX-30
Fuel Economy
X50
Value
X50
Practicality
CX-30
Pros & Cons
Mazda CX-30
More powerful engine (121 kW)
Factory service plan included
Higher fuel consumption (6.6 l/100km)
Higher starting price
Proton X50
Better fuel economy (6.5 l/100km)
Lower starting price (R535 900)
Less power than rival (110 kW vs 121 kW)
No factory service plan
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more fuel efficient, the CX-30 or X50?
The CX-30 uses 6.6 l/100km and the X50 uses 6.5 l/100km on the combined cycle. The X50 is the more fuel-efficient choice. In South African conditions with a mix of highway and urban driving, real-world figures will be slightly higher.
Which has more power, the CX-30 or X50?
The CX-30 produces 121 kW and 213 Nm of torque while the X50 delivers 110 kW and 226 Nm of torque. The CX-30 is the more powerful option.
What is the price difference between the CX-30 and X50?
The CX-30 starts from R539 800 and the X50 from R535 900. The X50 is cheaper by R3 900 at this variant level. Final on-the-road pricing varies by dealer and specification.
Which has a higher towing capacity, the CX-30 or X50?
The CX-30 has a braked towing capacity of 1200 Kg and the X50 can tow not specified. Always verify towing limits in the owner's manual before hitching a trailer.
Should I buy the CX-30 or the X50?
It depends on your priorities. If fuel economy matters most, check the L/100km figures above. If you need towing capacity, compare the towing ratings. For day-to-day South African driving - load shedding runs, potholed roads, school runs and highway commutes - consider ground clearance, service network coverage, and total cost of ownership including insurance and maintenance. Use the spec tables above to compare every detail before making your decision.