VS
At a Glance
Power
115 kW
115 kW
Torque
230 Nm
206 Nm
Fuel
7.8 l/100km
6.3 l/100km
Towing
—
850 Kg
0-100 km/h
—
9.5 s
Engine
1498 cc
1998 cc
Choosing between the Jetour Dashing and the Mazda CX-3 is one of the most common decisions South African car buyers face. The Jetour Dashing delivers 115 kW while the Mazda CX-3 produces 115 kW. On fuel, the Dashing returns 7.8 l/100km while the CX-3 uses 6.3 l/100km — important in a market where fuel prices change monthly. Pricing starts at R469 900 for the Dashing and R551 600 for the CX-3. Both vehicles have their merits. The right choice depends on your priorities: fuel economy, performance, towing ability, safety features or total cost of ownership. This comparison covers every specification available so you can make an informed decision.
Performance
Power Output
115 kW
115 kW
Torque
230 Nm
206 Nm
0-100 kph
—
9.5 s
Top Speed
180 Km/h
197 Km/h
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Capacity
1498 cc
1998 cc
Engine Layout
inline
inline
Cylinders
4
4
Fuel Type
petrol
petrol
Forced Induction Device
turbocharger
—
Transmission
automatic
automatic
Number of Gears
6
6
Drive Wheels
front
front
Fuel Economy
Fuel Consumption Average
7.8 l/100km
6.3 l/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity
57 l
48 l
CO2 Emissions
185 g/km
146 g/km
Dimensions
Length
4590 mm
4275 mm
Width
1900 mm
1765-2049 mm
Height
1685 mm
1550 mm
Wheelbase
2720 mm
2570 mm
Ground Clearance
160 mm
155 mm
Kerb Weight
1588 Kg
1270 Kg
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Load Volume
486-977 l
230-1140 l
Towing & Payload
Towing Capacity
—
850 Kg
Safety
ABS
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
EBD
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Brake Assist
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Stability Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Traction Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Airbag Count
6
6
Driver Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Passenger Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Side Airbags Front
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Curtain Airbags
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Features & Tech
Air Conditioning
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Climate Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Cruise Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Bluetooth
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Satellite Navigation
—
✓ Standard
Reversing Camera
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Park Distance Rear
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Park Distance Front
—
✓ Standard
Sunroof
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Keyless Entry
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Alloy Wheels
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Warranty & Service
Warranty Period
5 vehicle / 10 engine for 1st owner
5
Warranty Distance
150000 vehicle / 1000000 engine for 1st
unlimited Km
Service Plan
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Service Plan Years
5
3
Service Plan Distance
60000
unlimited
Service Intervals
15000
15000
The Verdict
Which Wins?
Overall Winner
Mazda CX-3
2 / 4 categories
Performance
Tied
Fuel Economy
CX-3
Value
Dashing
Practicality
CX-3
Pros & Cons
Jetour Dashing
Lower starting price (R469 900)
Higher fuel consumption (7.8 l/100km)
Mazda CX-3
Better fuel economy (6.3 l/100km)
Higher starting price
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more fuel efficient, the Dashing or CX-3?
The Dashing uses 7.8 l/100km and the CX-3 uses 6.3 l/100km on the combined cycle. The CX-3 is the more fuel-efficient choice. In South African conditions with a mix of highway and urban driving, real-world figures will be slightly higher.
Which has more power, the Dashing or CX-3?
The Dashing produces 115 kW and 230 Nm of torque while the CX-3 delivers 115 kW and 206 Nm of torque. They produce similar power outputs.
What is the price difference between the Dashing and CX-3?
The Dashing starts from R469 900 and the CX-3 from R551 600. The Dashing is cheaper by R81 700 at this variant level. Final on-the-road pricing varies by dealer and specification.
Which has a higher towing capacity, the Dashing or CX-3?
The Dashing has a braked towing capacity of not specified and the CX-3 can tow 850 Kg. Always verify towing limits in the owner's manual before hitching a trailer.
Should I buy the Dashing or the CX-3?
It depends on your priorities. If fuel economy matters most, check the L/100km figures above. If you need towing capacity, compare the towing ratings. For day-to-day South African driving - load shedding runs, potholed roads, school runs and highway commutes - consider ground clearance, service network coverage, and total cost of ownership including insurance and maintenance. Use the spec tables above to compare every detail before making your decision.