VS
At a Glance
Power
140 kW
141 kW
Torque
450 Nm
261 Nm
Fuel
7.6 l/100km
7.3 l/100km
Towing
3500 Kg
1500 Kg
0-100 km/h
—
9.6 s
Engine
2999 cc
2488 cc
Choosing between the Isuzu MU-X and the Mazda CX-60 is one of the most common decisions South African car buyers face. The Isuzu MU-X delivers 140 kW while the Mazda CX-60 produces 141 kW. On fuel, the MU-X returns 7.6 l/100km while the CX-60 uses 7.3 l/100km — important in a market where fuel prices change monthly. Pricing starts at R973 800 for the MU-X and R790 200 for the CX-60. Both vehicles have their merits. The right choice depends on your priorities: fuel economy, performance, towing ability, safety features or total cost of ownership. This comparison covers every specification available so you can make an informed decision.
Performance
Power Output
140 kW
141 kW
Torque
450 Nm
261 Nm
0-100 kph
—
9.6 s
Top Speed
—
203 Km/h
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Capacity
2999 cc
2488 cc
Engine Layout
inline
inline
Cylinders
4
4
Fuel Type
diesel
petrol
Forced Induction Device
turbocharger
—
Transmission
automatic
automatic
Number of Gears
6
8
Drive Wheels
all
rear
Full Time 4x4
✓ Standard
—
Low Range
✓ Standard
—
Fuel Economy
Fuel Consumption Average
7.6 l/100km
7.3 l/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity
80 l
58 l
CO2 Emissions
200 g/km
170 g/km
Dimensions
Length
4850 mm
4745 mm
Width
1870 mm
1890-2134 mm
Height
1820 mm
1688 mm
Wheelbase
2855 mm
2870 mm
Ground Clearance
235 mm
179 mm
Kerb Weight
2080 Kg
1451 Kg
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
5
Load Volume
—
477-1148-1726 l
Towing & Payload
Towing Capacity
3500 Kg
1500 Kg
Load Capacity
659 l
—
Safety
ABS
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
EBD
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Brake Assist
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Stability Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Traction Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Airbag Count
7
7
Driver Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Passenger Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Side Airbags Front
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Curtain Airbags
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Features & Tech
Air Conditioning
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Climate Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Cruise Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Bluetooth
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Reversing Camera
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Park Distance Rear
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Park Distance Front
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Sunroof
—
✓ Standard
Keyless Entry
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Alloy Wheels
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Warranty & Service
Warranty Period
5
5
Warranty Distance
120000 Km
unlimited Km
Service Plan
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Service Plan Years
6
5
Service Plan Distance
90000
unlimited
Service Intervals
15000
15000
The Verdict
Which Wins?
Overall Winner
Mazda CX-60
3 / 4 categories
Performance
CX-60
Fuel Economy
CX-60
Value
CX-60
Practicality
MU-X
Pros & Cons
Isuzu MU-X
Higher towing capacity (3500 Kg)
Higher fuel consumption (7.6 l/100km)
Less power than rival (140 kW vs 141 kW)
Higher starting price
Mazda CX-60
More powerful engine (141 kW)
Better fuel economy (7.3 l/100km)
Lower starting price (R790 200)
Few notable weaknesses
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more fuel efficient, the MU-X or CX-60?
The MU-X uses 7.6 l/100km and the CX-60 uses 7.3 l/100km on the combined cycle. The CX-60 is the more fuel-efficient choice. In South African conditions with a mix of highway and urban driving, real-world figures will be slightly higher.
Which has more power, the MU-X or CX-60?
The MU-X produces 140 kW and 450 Nm of torque while the CX-60 delivers 141 kW and 261 Nm of torque. The CX-60 is the more powerful option.
What is the price difference between the MU-X and CX-60?
The MU-X starts from R973 800 and the CX-60 from R790 200. The CX-60 is cheaper by R183 600 at this variant level. Final on-the-road pricing varies by dealer and specification.
Which has a higher towing capacity, the MU-X or CX-60?
The MU-X has a braked towing capacity of 3500 Kg and the CX-60 can tow 1500 Kg. Always verify towing limits in the owner's manual before hitching a trailer.
Should I buy the MU-X or the CX-60?
It depends on your priorities. If fuel economy matters most, check the L/100km figures above. If you need towing capacity, compare the towing ratings. For day-to-day South African driving - load shedding runs, potholed roads, school runs and highway commutes - consider ground clearance, service network coverage, and total cost of ownership including insurance and maintenance. Use the spec tables above to compare every detail before making your decision.