VS
At a Glance
Power
77kW@6200
121 kW
Torque
138Nm@3400
213 Nm
Fuel
—
6.6 l/100km
Towing
1154
1200 Kg
0-100 km/h
14.6
—
Engine
1590
1998 cc
Choosing between the HONDA HR-V and the Mazda CX-30 is one of the most common decisions South African car buyers face. The HONDA HR-V delivers 77kW@6200 while the Mazda CX-30 produces 121 kW. On fuel, the HR-V returns 0 while the CX-30 uses 6.6 l/100km — important in a market where fuel prices change monthly. Pricing starts at R218 900 for the HR-V and R651 500 for the CX-30. Both vehicles have their merits. The right choice depends on your priorities: fuel economy, performance, towing ability, safety features or total cost of ownership. This comparison covers every specification available so you can make an informed decision.
Performance
Power Output
77kW@6200
121 kW
Torque
138Nm@3400
213 Nm
0-100 kph
14.6
—
Top Speed
169
196 Km/h
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Capacity
1590
1998 cc
Engine Layout
TRANSVERSE INLINE 4
inline
Cylinders
4
4
Fuel Type
UNLEADED
petrol
Transmission
MANUAL
automatic
Number of Gears
5
6
Drive Wheels
ALL
front
Full Time 4x4
✗
—
Low Range
✗
—
Fuel Economy
Fuel Consumption Average
—
6.6 l/100km
Fuel Consumption Urban
—
—
Fuel Consumption Highway
—
—
Fuel Tank Capacity
55
51 l
CO2 Emissions
—
150 g/km
Dimensions
Length
4110
4395 mm
Width
1695
1795-2040 mm
Height
1580
1540 mm
Wheelbase
2450
2655 mm
Ground Clearance
190
175 mm
Kerb Weight
1154
1340 Kg
Doors
5
5
Seats
4
5
Load Volume
—
295-1200 l
Towing & Payload
Towing Capacity
1154
1200 Kg
Load Capacity
603
—
Safety
ABS
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
EBD
—
✓ Standard
Brake Assist
—
✓ Standard
Stability Control
✗
✓ Standard
Traction Control
✗
—
Airbag Count
2
7
Driver Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Passenger Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Side Airbags Front
—
✓ Standard
Curtain Airbags
—
✓ Standard
Features & Tech
Air Conditioning
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Climate Control
✗
✓ Standard
Cruise Control
✗
✓ Standard
Bluetooth
—
✓ Standard
Satellite Navigation
?
—
Reversing Camera
—
✓ Standard
Park Distance Rear
—
✓ Standard
Park Distance Front
—
✓ Standard
Sunroof
✗
✓ Standard
Electric Seat Adjustment
✗
—
Keyless Entry
?
✓ Standard
Alloy Wheels
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Warranty & Service
Warranty Period
36
5
Warranty Distance
100000
unlimited Km
Service Plan
M
✓ Standard
Service Plan Years
—
5
Service Plan Distance
—
unlimited
Service Intervals
20000
15000
The Verdict
Which Wins?
Overall Winner
Mazda CX-30
2 / 4 categories
Performance
CX-30
Fuel Economy
Tied
Value
HR-V
Practicality
CX-30
Pros & Cons
HONDA HR-V
Lower starting price (R218 900)
No factory service plan
Mazda CX-30
Higher towing capacity (1200 Kg)
Factory service plan included
Higher fuel consumption (6.6 l/100km)
Higher starting price
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more fuel efficient, the HR-V or CX-30?
The HR-V uses 0 and the CX-30 uses 6.6 l/100km on the combined cycle. In South African conditions with a mix of highway and urban driving, real-world figures will be slightly higher.
Which has more power, the HR-V or CX-30?
The HR-V produces 77kW@6200 and 138Nm@3400 of torque while the CX-30 delivers 121 kW and 213 Nm of torque. They produce similar power outputs.
What is the price difference between the HR-V and CX-30?
The HR-V starts from R218 900 and the CX-30 from R651 500. The HR-V is cheaper by R432 600 at this variant level. Final on-the-road pricing varies by dealer and specification.
Which has a higher towing capacity, the HR-V or CX-30?
The HR-V has a braked towing capacity of 1154 and the CX-30 can tow 1200 Kg. Always verify towing limits in the owner's manual before hitching a trailer.
Should I buy the HR-V or the CX-30?
It depends on your priorities. If fuel economy matters most, check the L/100km figures above. If you need towing capacity, compare the towing ratings. For day-to-day South African driving - load shedding runs, potholed roads, school runs and highway commutes - consider ground clearance, service network coverage, and total cost of ownership including insurance and maintenance. Use the spec tables above to compare every detail before making your decision.