VS
At a Glance
Power
154 kW
120kW@5650
Torque
500 Nm
220Nm@4000
Fuel
7.5 l/100km
13.96
Towing
3500 Kg
1200
0-100 km/h
—
12.82
Engine
1996 cc
2378
Choosing between the Ford Everest and the Mitsubishi Outlander is one of the most common decisions South African car buyers face. The Ford Everest delivers 154 kW while the Mitsubishi Outlander produces 120kW@5650. On fuel, the Everest returns 7.5 l/100km while the Outlander uses 13.96 — important in a market where fuel prices change monthly. Pricing starts at R1 122 500 for the Everest and R269 000 for the Outlander. Both vehicles have their merits. The right choice depends on your priorities: fuel economy, performance, towing ability, safety features or total cost of ownership. This comparison covers every specification available so you can make an informed decision.
Performance
Power Output
154 kW
120kW@5650
Torque
500 Nm
220Nm@4000
0-100 kph
—
12.82
Top Speed
—
184
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Capacity
1996 cc
2378
Engine Layout
inline
TRANSVERSE INLINE 4
Cylinders
4
4
Fuel Type
diesel
UNLEADED
Forced Induction Device
turbocharger
—
Transmission
automatic
AUTOMATIC
Number of Gears
10
4
Drive Wheels
all
ALL
Full Time 4x4
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Low Range
✓ Standard
✗
Fuel Economy
Fuel Consumption Average
7.5 l/100km
13.96
Fuel Consumption Urban
—
16.8
Fuel Consumption Highway
—
9.9
Fuel Tank Capacity
76 l
60
CO2 Emissions
198 g/km
—
Dimensions
Length
4940 mm
4545
Width
2015-2234 mm
1750
Height
1841 mm
1670
Wheelbase
2900 mm
2525
Ground Clearance
229 mm
205
Kerb Weight
2341 Kg
1508
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
5
Load Volume
259-898-1823 l
—
Towing & Payload
Towing Capacity
3500 Kg
1200
Load Capacity
759 l
1710
Safety
ABS
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Stability Control
✓ Standard
✗
Traction Control
✓ Standard
✗
Airbag Count
6
2
Driver Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Passenger Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Side Airbags Front
✓ Standard
—
Curtain Airbags
✓ Standard
—
Features & Tech
Air Conditioning
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Climate Control
✓ Standard
✗
Cruise Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Bluetooth
✓ Standard
—
Satellite Navigation
✓ Standard
✗
Reversing Camera
Optional
—
Park Distance Rear
✓ Standard
✗
Park Distance Front
✓ Standard
✗
Sunroof
—
✓ Standard
Heated Seats
—
✗
Electric Seat Adjustment
—
✗
Keyless Entry
✓ Standard
✗
Tow Bar
✓ Standard
—
Alloy Wheels
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Warranty & Service
Warranty Period
4
24
Warranty Distance
120000 Km
100000
Service Plan
Optional
M
Service Plan Years
6
—
Service Plan Distance
90000
—
Service Intervals
15000
15000
The Verdict
Which Wins?
Overall Winner
Ford Everest
3 / 4 categories
Performance
Everest
Fuel Economy
Everest
Value
Outlander
Practicality
Everest
Pros & Cons
Ford Everest
Better fuel economy (7.5 l/100km)
Higher towing capacity (3500 Kg)
Higher starting price
Mitsubishi Outlander
Lower starting price (R269 000)
Higher fuel consumption (13.96)
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more fuel efficient, the Everest or Outlander?
The Everest uses 7.5 l/100km and the Outlander uses 13.96 on the combined cycle. The Everest is the more fuel-efficient choice. In South African conditions with a mix of highway and urban driving, real-world figures will be slightly higher.
Which has more power, the Everest or Outlander?
The Everest produces 154 kW and 500 Nm of torque while the Outlander delivers 120kW@5650 and 220Nm@4000 of torque. They produce similar power outputs.
What is the price difference between the Everest and Outlander?
The Everest starts from R1 122 500 and the Outlander from R269 000. The Outlander is cheaper by R853 500 at this variant level. Final on-the-road pricing varies by dealer and specification.
Which has a higher towing capacity, the Everest or Outlander?
The Everest has a braked towing capacity of 3500 Kg and the Outlander can tow 1200. Always verify towing limits in the owner's manual before hitching a trailer.
Should I buy the Everest or the Outlander?
It depends on your priorities. If fuel economy matters most, check the L/100km figures above. If you need towing capacity, compare the towing ratings. For day-to-day South African driving - load shedding runs, potholed roads, school runs and highway commutes - consider ground clearance, service network coverage, and total cost of ownership including insurance and maintenance. Use the spec tables above to compare every detail before making your decision.