VS
At a Glance
Power
85 kW
59 kW
Torque
148 Nm
104 Nm
Fuel
7.2 l/100km
5.4 l/100km
Engine
1499 cc
1197 cc
Choosing between the DFSK C35 and the Suzuki Eeco is one of the most common decisions car buyers in South Africa face. The DFSK C35 delivers 85 kW while the Suzuki Eeco produces 59 kW. On fuel, the C35 returns 7.2 l/100km while the Eeco uses 5.4 l/100km — important in a market where fuel prices change monthly. Pricing starts at R304 950 for the C35 and R231 900 for the Eeco. Both vehicles have their merits. The right choice depends on your priorities: fuel economy, performance, towing ability, safety features or total cost of ownership. This comparison covers every specification available so you can make an informed decision.
Specification
DFSK C35DFSK 1.5 C35 F/C P/V (4 Seater) 2026 - From R304 950
Suzuki Eeco1.2 P/V 2023 - From R231 900
Performance
Power Output
85 kW
59 kW
Torque
148 Nm
104 Nm
Top Speed
140 Km/h
-
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Capacity
1499 cc
1197 cc
Engine Layout
inline
inline
Cylinders
4
4
Fuel Type
petrol
petrol
Transmission
manual
manual
Number of Gears
5
5
Drive Wheels
rear
rear
Fuel Economy
Fuel Consumption Average
7.2 l/100km
5.4 l/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity
55 l
32 l
CO2 Emissions
187 g/km
—
Dimensions
Length
4500 mm
3675 mm
Width
1680 mm
1475 mm
Height
1960 mm
1825 mm
Wheelbase
3050 mm
2350 mm
Ground Clearance
—
160 mm
Kerb Weight
1290 Kg
935 Kg
Doors
5 incl. 2 sliding side + 1 rear
5
Seats
4
2
Load Volume
2550 l
—
Towing & Payload
Load Capacity
495 lkg
615 lkg
Safety
ABS
Optional
✓ Standard
EBD
—
✓ Standard
Stability Control
—
✓ Standard
Airbag Count
-
2
Driver Airbag
—
✓ Standard
Passenger Airbag
—
✓ Standard
Features & Tech
Air Conditioning
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Park Distance Rear
—
✓ Standard
Warranty & Service
Warranty Period
5
3
Warranty Distance
100000 Km
100000 Km
Service Intervals
10000
15000
The Verdict
Which Wins?
Overall Winner
Tie
2 / 4 categories
Performance
C35
Fuel Economy
Eeco
Value
Eeco
Practicality
C35
Pros & Cons
DFSK C35
More powerful engine (85 kW)
Higher fuel consumption (7.2 l/100km)
Higher starting price
Suzuki Eeco
Better fuel economy (5.4 l/100km)
Lower starting price (R231 900)
Less power than rival (59 kW vs 85 kW)
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more fuel efficient, the C35 or Eeco?
The C35 uses 7.2 l/100km and the Eeco uses 5.4 l/100km on the combined cycle. The Eeco is the more fuel-efficient choice. In real-world conditions with a mix of highway and urban driving, actual figures will be slightly higher.
Which has more power, the C35 or Eeco?
The C35 produces 85 kW and 148 Nm of torque while the Eeco delivers 59 kW and 104 Nm of torque. The C35 is the more powerful option.
What is the price difference between the C35 and Eeco?
The C35 starts from R304 950 and the Eeco from R231 900. The Eeco is cheaper by R73 050 at this variant level. Final on-the-road pricing varies by dealer and specification.
Should I buy the C35 or the Eeco?
It depends on your priorities. If fuel economy matters most, check the L/100km figures above. If you need towing capacity, compare the towing ratings. For day-to-day South African driving - load shedding runs, potholed roads, school runs and highway commutes - consider ground clearance, service network coverage, and total cost of ownership including insurance and maintenance. Use the spec tables above to compare every detail before making your decision.