Part of the Specs-SA Network USA Car Specs · Boat Specs · All Vehicles

2025 BYD Shark 6
Shark 1.5 P/U D/C AWD (phev)
vs
2009 Toyota Land Cruiser 79
4.2d PICK-UP

From R989 900 vs From R398 600

BYD Shark 6
BYD Shark 6
Shark 1.5 P/U D/C AWD (phev)
From R989 900
★ Our Pick
View Full Specs →
VS
Toyota Land Cruiser 79
Toyota Land Cruiser 79
4.2d PICK-UP
From R398 600
View Full Specs →
At a Glance
Power
321 kW
96kW@3800
Torque
650 Nm
285Nm@2200
Fuel
2.0 when hybrid battery charged / 9.6 coL/100km
14.9L/100km
Towing
2500 Kg
1500kg
0-100 km/h
5.7 s
18s
Engine
1498 cc
4164cc

Choosing between the BYD Shark 6 and the Toyota Land Cruiser 79 is one of the most common decisions car buyers in South Africa face. The BYD Shark 6 delivers 321 kW while the Toyota Land Cruiser 79 produces 96kW@3800. On fuel, the Shark 6 returns 2.0 when hybrid battery charged / 9.6 coL/100km while the Land Cruiser 79 uses 14.9L/100km — important in a market where fuel prices change monthly. Pricing starts at R989 900 for the Shark 6 and R398 600 for the Land Cruiser 79. Both vehicles have their merits. The right choice depends on your priorities: fuel economy, performance, towing ability, safety features or total cost of ownership. This comparison covers every specification available so you can make an informed decision.

Specification
BYD Shark 6Shark 1.5 P/U D/C AWD (phev) 2025 - From R989 900
Toyota Land Cruiser 794.2d PICK-UP 2009 - From R398 600
Performance
Power Output
321 kW
96kW@3800
Torque
650 Nm
285Nm@2200
0-100 kph
5.7 s
18s
Top Speed
160 Km/h
140km/h
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Capacity
1498 cc
4164cc
Engine Layout
inline
LONGITUDINAL INLINE 6
Cylinders
4
6
Fuel Type
petrol-electric hybrid
DIESEL
Forced Induction Device
turbocharger
—
Transmission
automatic
MANUAL
Number of Gears
-
5
Drive Wheels
all
ALL
Full Time 4x4
✓ Standard
✗
Low Range
—
✓ Standard
Fuel Economy
Fuel Consumption Average
2.0 when hybrid battery charged / 9.6 coL/100km
14.9L/100km
Fuel Consumption Urban
—
17.3L/100km
Fuel Consumption Highway
—
10.06L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity
59 litre + 29.6 kWh l
180L
CO2 Emissions
46 when hybrid battery charged g/km
-
Dimensions
Length
5457 mm
5231mm
Width
1971 mm
1770-mm
Height
1925 mm
1970mm
Wheelbase
2920 mm
3180mm
Ground Clearance
230 mm
235mm
Kerb Weight
2710 Kg
2140kg
Doors
4
2
Seats
5
2
Load Volume
1200 l
—
Towing & Payload
Towing Capacity
2500 Kg
1500kg
Load Capacity
790 lkg
1105kg
Safety
ABS
✓ Standard
✗
EBD
✓ Standard
✗
Brake Assist
✓ Standard
—
Stability Control
✓ Standard
✗
Traction Control
✓ Standard
✗
Airbag Count
7
2
Driver Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Passenger Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Side Airbags Front
✓ Standard
✗
Curtain Airbags
✓ Standard
✗
Features & Tech
Air Conditioning
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Climate Control
✓ Standard
✗
Cruise Control
✓ Standard
✗
Adaptive Cruise Control
✓ Standard
-
Bluetooth
✓ Standard
-
Satellite Navigation
—
✗
Reversing Camera
✓ Standard
—
Park Distance Rear
✓ Standard
✗
Park Distance Front
✓ Standard
✗
Sunroof
—
✗
Heated Seats
✓ Standard
✗
Electric Seat Adjustment
—
✗
Keyless Entry
✓ Standard
✗
Alloy Wheels
✓ Standard
✗
Warranty & Service
Warranty Period
5 vehicle / 8 battery
36
Warranty Distance
100000 vehicle / 200000 battery Km
100000km
Service Plan
—
-
Service Intervals
20000
5000

Which Wins?

Overall Winner
BYD Shark 6
3 / 4 categories
Performance
Shark 6
Fuel Economy
Shark 6
Value
Land Cruiser 79
Practicality
Shark 6
BYD Shark 6
+Better fuel economy (2.0 when hybrid battery charged / 9.6 coL/100km)
+Higher towing capacity (2500 Kg)
+Quicker 0-100 km/h (5.7 ss)
-Higher starting price
Toyota Land Cruiser 79
+Lower starting price (R398 600)
-Higher fuel consumption (14.9L/100km)
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more fuel efficient, the Shark 6 or Land Cruiser 79?
The Shark 6 uses 2.0 when hybrid battery charged / 9.6 coL/100km and the Land Cruiser 79 uses 14.9L/100km on the combined cycle. The Shark 6 is the more fuel-efficient choice. In real-world conditions with a mix of highway and urban driving, actual figures will be slightly higher.
Which has more power, the Shark 6 or Land Cruiser 79?
The Shark 6 produces 321 kW and 650 Nm of torque while the Land Cruiser 79 delivers 96kW@3800 and 285Nm@2200 of torque. The Shark 6 is the more powerful option.
What is the price difference between the Shark 6 and Land Cruiser 79?
The Shark 6 starts from R989 900 and the Land Cruiser 79 from R398 600. The Land Cruiser 79 is cheaper by R591 300 at this variant level. Final on-the-road pricing varies by dealer and specification.
Which has a higher towing capacity, the Shark 6 or Land Cruiser 79?
The Shark 6 has a braked towing capacity of 2500 Kg and the Land Cruiser 79 can tow 1500kg. Always verify towing limits in the owner's manual before hitching a trailer.
Should I buy the Shark 6 or the Land Cruiser 79?
It depends on your priorities. If fuel economy matters most, check the L/100km figures above. If you need towing capacity, compare the towing ratings. For day-to-day South African driving - load shedding runs, potholed roads, school runs and highway commutes - consider ground clearance, service network coverage, and total cost of ownership including insurance and maintenance. Use the spec tables above to compare every detail before making your decision.

Toyota Land Cruiser 79 Variants

All Land Cruiser 79 Specs →

Try Another Comparison

▶ Start a New Comparison
Ad
320×50 Anchor