VS
At a Glance
Power
180kW@4000
141 kW
Torque
580Nm@1750
261 Nm
Fuel
6
7.7 l/100km
Towing
2400
1500 Kg
0-100 km/h
7
9.9 s
Engine
2967
2488 cc
Choosing between the AUDI Q5 and the Mazda CX-60 is one of the most common decisions South African car buyers face. The AUDI Q5 delivers 180kW@4000 while the Mazda CX-60 produces 141 kW. On fuel, the Q5 returns 6 while the CX-60 uses 7.7 l/100km — important in a market where fuel prices change monthly. Pricing starts at R637 500 for the Q5 and R902 000 for the CX-60. Both vehicles have their merits. The right choice depends on your priorities: fuel economy, performance, towing ability, safety features or total cost of ownership. This comparison covers every specification available so you can make an informed decision.
Performance
Power Output
180kW@4000
141 kW
Torque
580Nm@1750
261 Nm
0-100 kph
7
9.9 s
Top Speed
225
201 Km/h
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Capacity
2967
2488 cc
Engine Layout
LONGITUDINAL V 6
inline
Cylinders
6
4
Fuel Type
DIESEL
petrol
Transmission
AUTOMATIC
automatic
Number of Gears
7
8
Drive Wheels
ALL
all
Full Time 4x4
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Low Range
✗
—
Fuel Economy
Fuel Consumption Average
6
7.7 l/100km
Fuel Consumption Urban
7
—
Fuel Consumption Highway
6
—
Fuel Tank Capacity
75
58 l
CO2 Emissions
169
180 g/km
Dimensions
Length
4629
4745 mm
Width
-1898
1890-2134 mm
Height
1655
1688 mm
Wheelbase
2807
2870 mm
Ground Clearance
200
179 mm
Kerb Weight
1860
1470 Kg
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Load Volume
—
477-1148-1726 l
Towing & Payload
Towing Capacity
2400
1500 Kg
Load Capacity
1560
—
Safety
ABS
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
EBD
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Brake Assist
—
✓ Standard
Stability Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Traction Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Airbag Count
6
7
Driver Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Passenger Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Side Airbags Front
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Curtain Airbags
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Features & Tech
Air Conditioning
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Climate Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Cruise Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Adaptive Cruise Control
✗
✓ Standard
Bluetooth
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Satellite Navigation
Optional
✓ Standard
Reversing Camera
—
✓ Standard
Park Distance Rear
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Park Distance Front
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Sunroof
Optional
✓ Standard
Heated Seats
Optional
—
Electric Seat Adjustment
✓ Standard
—
Keyless Entry
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Alloy Wheels
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Warranty & Service
Warranty Period
12
5
Warranty Distance
—
unlimited Km
Service Plan
M
✓ Standard
Service Plan Years
—
5
Service Plan Distance
—
unlimited
Service Intervals
15000
15000
The Verdict
Which Wins?
Overall Winner
AUDI Q5
3 / 4 categories
Performance
CX-60
Fuel Economy
Q5
Value
Q5
Practicality
Q5
Pros & Cons
AUDI Q5
Better fuel economy (6)
Lower starting price (R637 500)
Higher towing capacity (2400)
Quicker 0-100 km/h (7s)
No factory service plan
Mazda CX-60
Factory service plan included
Higher fuel consumption (7.7 l/100km)
Higher starting price
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more fuel efficient, the Q5 or CX-60?
The Q5 uses 6 and the CX-60 uses 7.7 l/100km on the combined cycle. The Q5 is the more fuel-efficient choice. In South African conditions with a mix of highway and urban driving, real-world figures will be slightly higher.
Which has more power, the Q5 or CX-60?
The Q5 produces 180kW@4000 and 580Nm@1750 of torque while the CX-60 delivers 141 kW and 261 Nm of torque. They produce similar power outputs.
What is the price difference between the Q5 and CX-60?
The Q5 starts from R637 500 and the CX-60 from R902 000. The Q5 is cheaper by R264 500 at this variant level. Final on-the-road pricing varies by dealer and specification.
Which has a higher towing capacity, the Q5 or CX-60?
The Q5 has a braked towing capacity of 2400 and the CX-60 can tow 1500 Kg. Always verify towing limits in the owner's manual before hitching a trailer.
Should I buy the Q5 or the CX-60?
It depends on your priorities. If fuel economy matters most, check the L/100km figures above. If you need towing capacity, compare the towing ratings. For day-to-day South African driving - load shedding runs, potholed roads, school runs and highway commutes - consider ground clearance, service network coverage, and total cost of ownership including insurance and maintenance. Use the spec tables above to compare every detail before making your decision.