VS
At a Glance
Power
110 kW
110 kW
Torque
360 Nm
350 Nm
Fuel
5.0 l/100km
7.0 l/100km
Towing
2000 Kg
2100 Kg
0-100 km/h
9.2 s
—
Engine
1968 cc
1899 cc
Choosing between the Audi Q3 and the Isuzu MU-X is one of the most common decisions South African car buyers face. The Audi Q3 delivers 110 kW while the Isuzu MU-X produces 110 kW. On fuel, the Q3 returns 5.0 l/100km while the MU-X uses 7.0 l/100km — important in a market where fuel prices change monthly. Pricing starts at R905 300 for the Q3 and R752 400 for the MU-X. Both vehicles have their merits. The right choice depends on your priorities: fuel economy, performance, towing ability, safety features or total cost of ownership. This comparison covers every specification available so you can make an informed decision.
Performance
Power Output
110 kW
110 kW
Torque
360 Nm
350 Nm
0-100 kph
9.2 s
—
Top Speed
208 Km/h
—
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Capacity
1968 cc
1899 cc
Engine Layout
inline
inline
Cylinders
4
4
Fuel Type
diesel
diesel
Forced Induction Device
turbocharger
turbocharger
Transmission
automatic
automatic
Number of Gears
7
6
Drive Wheels
front
rear
Fuel Economy
Fuel Consumption Average
5.0 l/100km
7.0 l/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity
55 l
80 l
CO2 Emissions
133 g/km
185 g/km
Dimensions
Length
4531 mm
4850 mm
Width
1859 - 2087 mm
1870 mm
Height
1601 mm
1820 mm
Wheelbase
2681 mm
2855 mm
Ground Clearance
—
235 mm
Kerb Weight
1700 Kg
1905 Kg
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Load Volume
488 / 1386 l
—
Towing & Payload
Towing Capacity
2000 Kg
2100 Kg
Load Capacity
525 l
734 l
Safety
ABS
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
EBD
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Brake Assist
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Stability Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Traction Control
—
✓ Standard
Airbag Count
7 (opt 9)
7
Driver Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Passenger Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Side Airbags Front
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Curtain Airbags
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Features & Tech
Air Conditioning
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Climate Control
✓ Standard
—
Cruise Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Adaptive Cruise Control
✓ Standard
—
Bluetooth
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Satellite Navigation
✓ Standard
—
Reversing Camera
Optional
✓ Standard
Park Distance Rear
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Park Distance Front
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Sunroof
✓ Standard
—
Heated Seats
✓ Standard
—
Keyless Entry
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Tow Bar
Optional
—
Alloy Wheels
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Warranty & Service
Warranty Period
1
5
Warranty Distance
unlimited Km
120000 Km
Service Plan
—
✓ Standard
Service Plan Years
—
6
Service Plan Distance
—
90000
Service Intervals
service interval indicator (max 30000)
15000
The Verdict
Which Wins?
Overall Winner
Isuzu MU-X
2 / 4 categories
Performance
Tied
Fuel Economy
Q3
Value
MU-X
Practicality
MU-X
Pros & Cons
Audi Q3
Better fuel economy (5.0 l/100km)
Higher starting price
No factory service plan
Isuzu MU-X
Lower starting price (R752 400)
Higher towing capacity (2100 Kg)
Factory service plan included
Higher fuel consumption (7.0 l/100km)
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more fuel efficient, the Q3 or MU-X?
The Q3 uses 5.0 l/100km and the MU-X uses 7.0 l/100km on the combined cycle. The Q3 is the more fuel-efficient choice. In South African conditions with a mix of highway and urban driving, real-world figures will be slightly higher.
Which has more power, the Q3 or MU-X?
The Q3 produces 110 kW and 360 Nm of torque while the MU-X delivers 110 kW and 350 Nm of torque. They produce similar power outputs.
What is the price difference between the Q3 and MU-X?
The Q3 starts from R905 300 and the MU-X from R752 400. The MU-X is cheaper by R152 900 at this variant level. Final on-the-road pricing varies by dealer and specification.
Which has a higher towing capacity, the Q3 or MU-X?
The Q3 has a braked towing capacity of 2000 Kg and the MU-X can tow 2100 Kg. Always verify towing limits in the owner's manual before hitching a trailer.
Should I buy the Q3 or the MU-X?
It depends on your priorities. If fuel economy matters most, check the L/100km figures above. If you need towing capacity, compare the towing ratings. For day-to-day South African driving - load shedding runs, potholed roads, school runs and highway commutes - consider ground clearance, service network coverage, and total cost of ownership including insurance and maintenance. Use the spec tables above to compare every detail before making your decision.